* Provide a working rebar.cmd for system that need it
(Windows on non-PowerShell)
* Add tests for recent changes
If the "run" were to fail the job would too
* Check if Rust can find it
* feat: add escripts to path
* Update src/install-elixir.ps1
Co-authored-by: Paulo F. Oliveira <paulo.ferraz.oliveira@gmail.com>
* add github action combo to test escript
* force install
* use os homedir for escript install path
Co-authored-by: Paulo F. Oliveira <paulo.ferraz.oliveira@gmail.com>
* Ease consumption by means of .tool-versions
* Update as per self-review
* Update as per self-review
* Act on CI results
* Act on CI results
* Act on CI results
This value is check by code, in any case
* Act on CI results
* Act on CI results
* Act on CI results
It appears we can't install Elixir twice on Windows, but can
on Ubuntu; this is outside the scope of this branch's context
so I won't fix it now
* Tweak visual consumption elements
* Ease potential future maintenance and/or update
* Update all our deps
Get rid of warnings such as:
* `save-state` will be deprecated
* `set-output` will be deprecated
* nodejs 12 is being deprecated
...
Rely on tests to make sure the actions still works
* Fix as per CI results
* Get rid of deprecated containers
* Have a warningless run
We're not testing rebar3 here, in any case
* Check tests failing for something that should pass
* Test with version-type: strict
* Add more tests
GitHub actions is refusing to run a given workflow :shrug
* Try to fix new test that shouldn't be failing
Which is exactly what we intended to originate by starting a new
pull request.
* Fix tests as per CI
* Fix tests as per CI
* Adapt to "latest"
* Fix as per CI results
Actions' window shows everything as Ok but then internals not
Error when evaluating 'runs-on' for job 'integration_test'. .github/workflows/ubuntu.yml (Line: 19, Col: 14): Unexpected type of value '', expected type: OneOf.
Strange one, this one!
* Try to "help" for non-OTP declared input
We do this for OTP-, but not for maint-
as the former is hopefully more common
than the latter
* Introduce `latest` to signify `master`
Semantically they're similar, but with `latest` we know:
1. to fetch Elixir's no-otp-... version
2. to fetch Erlang's master
whereas with 25 (latest at this moment) we'd
try to fetch elixirvsn-otp-25 which could fail with
Elixir master and version-type strict
* Fix as per CI
Still not 100% convinced that `latest` should be separate from `master`
but I want to know how tests run, in this case in particular
* Fix as per CI
* Fix as per CI
* Revert potential wrong decision
* Fix as per understand recent Elixir changes (namely master v. main)
* Try to simplify it
We introduce the concept of version v. branch (as per @ericmj)
and we use that to find the most appropriate Erlang/Elixir combo.
* Prevent "future" errors when choosing incompatible Elixir v. OTP versions
* Fix tests as per GitHub Actions' output
* Make test elixir `master` strict
It has no -otp- in the name
* Update for latest Gleam
- Gleam releases now use LLVM triplets for platforms so the download
URLs have been updated accordingly.
- Gleam's rebar3 support has been removed.
This change means that future versions of this action cannot download
older versions of Gleam. I can make it backwards compatible, but I will
need help from someone who can convert the shell script into PowerShell
for Windows.
* Support older Gleam versions
* Remove rebar from Gleam
Don't take `maint-` -prefixed versions into account unless they're asked for it
specifically
At the same time, while fetching versions, make sure we identify them better so that
25 does not end up pulling maint-25 instead of OTP-25.0, as it should
* Add Erlang/OTP 25+ (not RC) to tests
* Test a specific combo
And a strict version
* Allow testing "edge" cases
We weren't taking our own considerations into account for version strictness
We want to be able to test cases where we use -otp- (if the consumer is doing
it, at least they have to use _strict_ to assert their decision)
* Apply security fix as proposed by Dependabot
I actually went to the developer first, pull request the lib., but then my
update got reject, since the lib. moved to TypeScript (from JavaScript);
still, a new release was done and this might just solve our issue
* Update eslint as warned by GitHub notifications
Paulo F. Oliveira